<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adium beta adds Twitter as a &#8220;group chat.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://voilleque.com/2009/05/adium-beta-adds-twitter-as-a-group-chat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://voilleque.com/2009/05/adium-beta-adds-twitter-as-a-group-chat/</link>
	<description>@lawduck&#039;s longer thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:31:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Youell</title>
		<link>http://voilleque.com/2009/05/adium-beta-adds-twitter-as-a-group-chat/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Youell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://voilleque.com/?p=169#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I saw your tweet about the new Adium and I was immediately stoked. I&#039;ve been an Adium user for years, although lately I&#039;ve split 50/50 between Adium and Yahoo clients. (Yahoo made some improvements and seems to have recommitted to the Mac.)

Adding Twitter capability to chat seems like a natural win. But looking at how it works I&#039;m kind of wondering if it doesn&#039;t blow the point. Twitter is a bit more than group chat.

I hope you&#039;ll give the less intrepid of us a review after you&#039;ve used it a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw your tweet about the new Adium and I was immediately stoked. I&#8217;ve been an Adium user for years, although lately I&#8217;ve split 50/50 between Adium and Yahoo clients. (Yahoo made some improvements and seems to have recommitted to the Mac.)</p>
<p>Adding Twitter capability to chat seems like a natural win. But looking at how it works I&#8217;m kind of wondering if it doesn&#8217;t blow the point. Twitter is a bit more than group chat.</p>
<p>I hope you&#8217;ll give the less intrepid of us a review after you&#8217;ve used it a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
